Matching with ownership
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider a hybrid model at the intersection of standard two-sided matching market as proposed by Gale and Shapley (1962) housing Scarf (1974). Two sets agents have to be matched in pairs common set objects. Agents one type preferences that depend on not only object they are but also agent other this object. The crucial difference lies fact side is interpreted an has no intrinsic over it. introduce natural definition ownership objects determines which owns he to. Ownership restricts objections who owners defines notion stability. two structures show stable matchings exist both structures. first structure, i.e., one-side ownership, always gives same side. Even if structure shares similarities with classical framework, we following important difference: Pareto-efficient can disjoints, implying core empty. propose subdomains preferences, lexicographic couple where one-sided second joint any reallocation must jointly agreed upon initially assigned them. As discussed Morrill (2010), equivalent matchings, discuss possible algorithms used check Pareto efficiency. Finally, general ownerships ones guarantee existence matchings. To further investigate link literature, initial allocation define respect allocation. contrast setting, However, there exists blocked coalition size two. In settings, pairwise stability minimal requirement ensure.
منابع مشابه
Linearizability with Ownership Transfer
Linearizability is a commonly accepted notion of correctness for libraries ofconcurrent algorithms. Unfortunately, it assumes a complete isolation between a libraryand its client, with interactions limited to passing values of a given data type. This isinappropriate for common programming languages, where libraries and their clients cancommunicate via the heap, transferring the ...
متن کاملRelaxing Ownership with Immutability
Multiple ownership [4] introduced a novel approach to managing object ownership information called “owners-as-boxes”. Each object is placed in a “box” or context and the nesting relationship between “boxes” or contexts respects the object accesses that happen during the program’s execution. No restrictions are placed on which objects are allowed to access which other objects, rather the ownersh...
متن کاملTax Avoidance and Institutional Ownership: Active vs. Passive Ownership
Income tax is one of the most important costs of companies and it is usually considered as a cost that should not be paid. One of the most noticeable and influential factors in tax avoidance is corporate ownership structure. With an emphasis on institutional ownership and its types in this paper, it is attempted to measure the effect of this ownership and its types on corporate tax avoidance. F...
متن کاملCheaper Reasoning with Ownership Types
We use ownership types to facilitate program verification. Namely, an assertion that has been established for a part of the heap which is unaffected by some execution will still hold after this execution. We use ownership and effects, and extend them to assertions to be able to make the judgement as to which executions do not affect which assertions. We describe the ideas in terms of an example...
متن کاملVariant Ownership with Existential Types
We propose an ownership types system with existential quantification of owners, similar to the existential quantification of types in models of Java wildcards. This produces a system with variant ownership types. Using explicit existential types for variance is more expressive, less ad hoc, and easier to understand and reason about than previous solutions. Furthermore, we propose using both typ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Mathematical Economics
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1873-1538', '0304-4068']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2021.102563